Support programmes
With our financial resources we support individual researchers and research teams with personal fellowships and project funding.
All about support programmes
The issue of research integrity has become increasingly topical in recent years. A number of high-profile cases of researchers who do not always respect the scientific and moral standards of research have surfaced in various countries.
Research integrity is closely linked but not quite identical to research ethics. Integrity specifically involves those aspects that are linked to the quality of research practice and its results. Ethics is primarily about standards and values to be taken into account by the researcher to protect the well-being of humans and animals involved in research and the results thereof. A researcher may falsify data without immediately putting humans or animals at risk. Such a researcher does not act with integrity, for the results of his research are unreliable, but he does not engage in direct unethical conduct with respect to humans, animals and their environment. However, the fact that the use of such manipulated results may eventually cause harm to humans, animals and their environment, shows that integrity and ethics can never be completely separated. From a broad ethical point of view, falsification of research data or otherwise tampering with research data is, of course, unacceptable. Therefore, it may be better to consider research integrity as a special dimension of research ethics.
As the organisation in charge of research funding in Flanders, the FWO has a great responsibility in preventing and, where necessary, combating infringements of research ethics. It intends to fully shoulder this responsibility by implementing actions both within and outside the walls of the FWO.
In 2013, a taskforce at FWO set out to propose measures to ensure research integrity. The taskforce was made up of academics from the Flemish universities and from various research areas. It was chaired by Professor Jacob Fokkema, Honorary Rector of TU Delft and member of the Board of Trustees of the FWO. The conclusions of the taskforce have been the subject of intensive consultation between the FWO and the Flemish universities. The proposals were approved by the Board of Trustees in June 2015.
Attention was directed to both prevention and awareness raising, detection and monitoring, corrective action and sanctioning.
The following measures were implemented:
To prevent infringements and raise the awareness of researchers benefiting from FWO funding, all calls, application forms and agreements between the researchers and the FWO incorporate a research integrity clause.
The text of this clause informs researchers benefiting from FWO funding, their host institutions, (co-)supervisors and other staff involved in FWO research, of their obligation to comply at all times with research integrity standards. The Ethische Code voor wetenschappelijk onderzoek in Belgiƫ and the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity are included as attachments to calls, application forms and agreements. They contain the fundamental ethical rules of conduct. The FWO assumes that every researcher submitting an application has taken cognisance of these codes and undertakes to comply with their provisions in all stages of the proposed research. This also applies for their host institutions, (co-)supervisors and staff involved in FWO research for which they assume co-responsibility.
In case of doubt regarding the applicability or the method of application of a provision, the host institution and/or the researcher responsible for the project or fellowship is expected to contact the FWO administration in order to provide clarification and agree on specific arrangements in this respect.
Prevention and awareness raising inherently imply a clear description of the role of the supervisor on the one hand, and of the role of the PhD student and other junior researchers on the other hand.[1] Every researcher, both supervisory and executive level, should be properly informed of what is expected of them, of what is and what is not acceptable. This also applies to the host institution where they are active.
In this context, a 'junior researcher' denotes not only the PhD student, but also other researchers working under the supervision of a supervisor. Their responsibilities in conducting the research are in fact similar to those of the PhD students and the supervisor is also responsible for their guidance. Since the FWO has a direct relationship only with supervisors and fellows, researchers assigned to research projects are mentioned only in the profile description of supervisors. However, such researchers can also prepare a PhD and can also identify with the content of the profile description of PhD students. Where the supervisor profile speaks of 'PhD student', the latter may therefore be either a fellow or a project assistant. The description 'other researchers associated with his FWO research project' in the supervisor profile refers only to assistants that are not PhD students. Moreover, postdoctoral researchers may also be addressed, because they can be active as fellows of the FWO or as assistant or co-supervisor of an FWO project.
The FWO expects the (co-)supervisor of an FWO research project or an FWO research fellowship to meet a number of specific requirements. By accepting such a supervisor role, the (co-)supervisor in each case undertakes to meet the requirements, responsibilities and tasks set out below.
The (co-)supervisor (both as supervisor of a PhD candidate or postdoctoral researcher and of the principal investigator or co-supervisor of an FWO research project):
Research competences
is actively engaged in scientific research at a high academic level;
operates within a research domain that is sufficiently compatible with that of the PhD candidate, postdoctoral researcher, or other researchers associated with the FWO research project;
is able to offer the necessary expertise, infrastructure and guidance;
Design, planning and preconditions
is co-responsible for the design and planning of the research conducted by the researchers associated with the FWO research project in relation to their research competences;
helps ensure adequate integration into the research unit where the PhD candidate, the postdoctoral researcher or other researchers associated with the FWO research project are active; where appropriate, this responsibility is shared with other projects managers within the unit;
creates the scientific, technical, and psychosocial preconditions that are indispensable for the proper functioning of the PhD candidate, the postdoctoral researcher or other researchers associated with this FWO research project;
Consultation, evaluation and corrective action
supervises the research of the PhD candidate, postdoctoral researcher, or researchers affiliated with the FWO research project and provides sufficient opportunities for contact moments to thoroughly discuss the relevant aspects; the intensity of the supervision provided to other researchers associated with this FWO research project is commensurate with their contribution to that project;
evaluates the performance of the researchers for whom they are responsible and provides timely guidance and corrective action when necessary;
Publications
ensures that the PhD candidate publishes the research results when they are ready for publication, but also prevents the publication of results that are not yet suitable for publication or that are presented in a manner that does not comply with the generally accepted standards of scientific research practice; this also applies to postdoctoral researchers, in relation to their more advanced research competences, and to other researchers associated with the FWO research project as their contribution to the project justifies this;
adequately informs the researchers under their responsibility of the responsibility they bear for the contributions they have made to a publication, and also assumes the responsibilities associated with (co-)authorship;
ensures that the PhD candidate and the postdoctoral researcher are recognised as (co-)authors of publications that are (wholly or partly) based on their research and to which they have made a writing contribution, and that, in publications with multiple authors, they are assigned a position in the author list that reflects their contribution to the publication; where appropriate, this also applies to other researchers associated with the FWO research project;
ensures that, where the PhD candidate or postdoctoral researcher has made the principal contribution to the research and the resulting publication, they are given the opportunity to be listed as first author or main author;
Data management
ensures that data relating to the research conducted under their supervision are stored securely and durably, taking into account the specific characteristics of the discipline and the nature of the research;
Training and professional experience
oversees the PhD training programme and encourages the use of other opportunities for training and professional experience that may promote the PhD research or the future career of the PhD candidate or postdoctoral researcher;
introduces the PhD candidate or postdoctoral researcher to relevant research networks and encourages active participation in those networks;
maximises the recognition and utilisation of the expertise that the PhD candidate or postdoctoral researcher brings to the research group;
Research independence
provides a level of autonomy that is appropriate to the research competences of the PhD candidate or postdoctoral researcher and that allows sufficient room for the development of scientific independence;
Research integrity
ensures that the PhD candidate, the postdoctoral researchers and other researchers associated with this FWO research project adhere to generally accepted standards of research integrity;
familiarises themselves with the regulations and guidelines on research integrity of both their own research institution and the FWO;
complies with these standards themselves and creates an environment in which these standards guide the conduct of all parties involved.
1. Rights
2. Duties
1. Rights
2. Duties
The general regulations and the regulations for pre- and postdoctoral researchers have been modified to allow the FWO to adequately respond to any research integrity issues experienced with beneficiaries of FWO funding. These modifications already cover the area of correction and sanctioning. They also provide for proper alignment with the host institutions where the researchers are active.
Because vigilance is also required in Flanders, the FWO took the initiative to establish a Vlaamse Commissie voor Wetenschappelijke Integriteit (Flemish Committee for Scientific Integrity, VCWI) in 2011. It was established on 9 October 2013 and is located in the Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Science and the Arts (KVAB), which provides the secretariat there. The organisations that together decided to establish the VCWI are:
These institutions have approved the regulations of the VCWI and stated they will incorporate the recommendations of the VCWI in their decision-making process.
The VCWI has two tasks:
1. give advice on concrete case files that have already been dealt with in one or more of the committees for scientific integrity of the Flemish universities at the institutions concerned;
2. give advice on more general questions concerning this subject matter.
This committee thus contributes to the uniform treatment of questions in connection with research ethics and awareness-raising surrounding this issue.
More information can be found on the VCWI website www.vcwi.be. The site also describes who can consult the VCWI and how this should be done.
FWO is a member of Science Europe, which has included research integrity in its Strategy Plan 2021-2026.
In the European Network of Research Integrity Offices (ENRIO) Flanders is represented by the VCWI. This network is a platform for the discussion between different European organisations about the policy on this subject.
.